Hi, just chirping in; we've upgraded a bunch of old 6.x servers to 8.0 with ZFS. This is a pair of HP DL385 G1s (dual opteron, old stuff) with SmartArray controllers, which had absolutely horrible performance in both 6.0 and 8.0. The drive array gave us ~25 mbyte/s sustained, which is obviously abysmal for U320/15k SCSI drives backed by hardware RAID and cache. We ended up splitting the hardware RAID into single drives, and using ZFS/RaidZ. We suddenly got around 45 mbye/s (still bad) per channel, adding up nicely when benchmarking the RaidZ volume. MySQL now performs much better than before, and we've enabled compression (gzip-2) and fixed block sizes. Compression ratio is about 1.7:1, transaction latency on the database (as seen from application) has gone down by about 65% on average. We see anything between 300 and 2000 queries/second throughout the day, and our active dataset is about 500GB. The servers have 8GB of memory. /Eirik On Apr 29, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: > Hi Y'all, > > I've written before that we're considering moving to FreeBSD 8 from > OpenSolaris and are heavily reliant on ZFS. Has anyone used FreeBSDs > ZFS implementation for a high reliability environment like a database? > If so, what are your experiences? > > Basically, I'm curious how stable the implementation is and whether > it's ready for a critical production environment. Also, any gotchas > particularly with running it with MySQL or anything else that utilizes > a lot of memory. On Solaris, we cap the max ARC size to keep it from > grabbing all the system RAM and competing with MySQL. > > Any thoughts or comments are greatly appreciated. > > -J > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Fri May 07 2010 - 15:54:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC