Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting

From: Michael Butler <imb_at_protected-networks.net>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 20:07:48 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/30/10 19:54, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Shouldn't SU+J be visible in the output of "mount" somehow? I've just
> enabled it on a root file system of a machine and while tunefs and
> dumpfs report both soft-updates and SUJ are enabled (after reboot), the
> "mount" command only shows "soft-updates". Alternative question: how to
> verify is it active on a live file system?

tunefs -p <file-system>

works even when the file-system is mounted in multi-user mode, e.g.

imb_at_toshi:/home/imb> tunefs -p /
tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a)                                disabled
tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N)                                   disabled
tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l)                               disabled
tunefs: soft updates: (-n)                                 enabled
tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j)                       enabled
tunefs: gjournal: (-J)                                     disabled
tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e)  2048
tunefs: average file size: (-f)                            16384
tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s)       64
tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m)             8%
tunefs: optimization preference: (-o)                      time
tunefs: volume label: (-L)


	imb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwC/dQACgkQQv9rrgRC1JKzagCgiviuFD/uTunc5bYQvkjvnT0j
p1IAn3OJ8af8W4Jjj34cZVUyX4EMDk32
=cw0I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sun May 30 2010 - 22:07:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC