Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting

From: Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 00:25:40 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:

> Shouldn't SU+J be visible in the output of "mount" somehow? I've just enabled 
> it on a root file system of a machine and while tunefs and dumpfs report both 
> soft-updates and SUJ are enabled (after reboot), the "mount" command only 
> shows "soft-updates". Alternative question: how to verify is it active on a 
> live file system?
>
> (running CURRENT from a few hours ago, kernel&world synced)

As previously stated - this is a hack to do what I think you are
asking for:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100309-03-mount.diff

Using tunefs, etc. for now would be better.

/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb      I will let you know once I escaped from my bird cage
and learnt to fly again.            -- Ottawa, ON, Canada, 21st May 2010
Received on Sun May 30 2010 - 22:30:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC