On 05/31/10 02:25, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Shouldn't SU+J be visible in the output of "mount" somehow? I've just >> enabled it on a root file system of a machine and while tunefs and >> dumpfs report both soft-updates and SUJ are enabled (after reboot), >> the "mount" command only shows "soft-updates". Alternative question: >> how to verify is it active on a live file system? >> >> (running CURRENT from a few hours ago, kernel&world synced) > > As previously stated - this is a hack to do what I think you are > asking for: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100309-03-mount.diff Yes, this looks like it... > Using tunefs, etc. for now would be better. I did use tunefs, as I've said, but I'm concerned what would happen (if it can - stale kernel?) if the superblock that tunefs reads from the disk and the kernel state are different.Received on Mon May 31 2010 - 07:08:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC