On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:38, David DEMELIER <demelier.david_at_gmail.com> wrote: > A lot of ports will need some patches then, isn't it ? Most were taken care of back when it happened - many either included utmp.h and never used it or only used it trivially, so it was easy to fix (I submitted patches for some and I'm definitely not a great programmer). So the fact that it wasn't fixed either means nobody cares about that port (somewhat true here - most of the KDE people moved on to 4) or that the fix will be more involved (probably the case for this one). -- Rob FarmerReceived on Tue Nov 02 2010 - 17:50:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC