on 12/09/2010 13:37 Alexander Motin said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> acpi_lid0: Lid closed >> em0: Link is up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex >> PROCESSOR-0722 [402244] cpu_cx_cst : acpi_cpu0: Got C2 - 245 latency >> PROCESSOR-0722 [403097] cpu_cx_cst : acpi_cpu1: Got C2 - 245 latency >> PROCESSOR-0722 [403855] cpu_cx_cst : acpi_cpu2: Got C2 - 245 latency >> PROCESSOR-0722 [405022] cpu_cx_cst : acpi_cpu3: Got C2 - 245 latency >> >> Maybe because of this? >> It seems like you do something and ACPI disables C3, leaving only C2/ > > One strange thing. During boot it can be seen: > acpi_cpu0: Got C2 - 205 latency > acpi_cpu0: Got C3 - 245 latency > , but after boot in sysctl we can see: > dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/245 > > It respecting latency it looks like not C3 got lost, but C2. AFAIR, > sysctl numbers C-states completely abstract, just as array indexes. So > thing reported as C2 could instead be C3, while C2 is absent for some > reason. Observations are correct, but incomplete; the conclusions are wrong. At the end of the boot there are message like this one: PROCESSOR-0722 [402244] cpu_cx_cst : acpi_cpu0: Got C2 - 245 latency This is a result of re-evaluation of _CST because of a notification from ACPI. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Sun Sep 12 2010 - 13:22:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC