on 12/09/2010 18:22 Andriy Gapon said the following: > Observations are correct, but incomplete; the conclusions are wrong. > At the end of the boot there are message like this one: > PROCESSOR-0722 [402244] cpu_cx_cst : acpi_cpu0: Got C2 - 245 latency > This is a result of re-evaluation of _CST because of a notification from ACPI. > But still, as you suggest, a patch like the following should be tested and committed: --- a/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c +++ b/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c _at__at_ -828,7 +828,8 _at__at_ acpi_cpu_cx_list(struct acpi_cpu_softc *sc) sbuf_new(&sb, sc->cpu_cx_supported, sizeof(sc->cpu_cx_supported), SBUF_FIXEDLEN); for (i = 0; i < sc->cpu_cx_count; i++) { - sbuf_printf(&sb, "C%d/%d ", i + 1, sc->cpu_cx_states[i].trans_lat); + sbuf_printf(&sb, "C%d/%d ", sc->cpu_cx_states[i].type, + sc->cpu_cx_states[i].trans_lat); if (sc->cpu_cx_states[i].type < ACPI_STATE_C3) sc->cpu_non_c3 = i; } P.S. I restored acpi_at_ cc: which I think is quite relevant, but was somehow lost. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Sun Sep 12 2010 - 13:39:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC