2010/9/22 Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_freebsd.org>: > Hi, > > Is there any reason to keep MAXCPU at 16 in the default kernel config? There > are quite few servers on the market today that have 24 or even 32 physical > cores. With hyper-threading this can even go as high as 48 or 64 virtual > cpus. People who buy such hardware might get very disappointed finding out > that the FreeBSD is not going to use such hardware to its full potential. > > Does anybody object if I'd bump MAXCPU to 32, which is still low but might > me more reasonable default these days, or at least make it an kernel > configuration option documented in the NOTES? Please correct me, if I'm about smth. different, but isn't it already? /sys/amd64/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 32 /sys/arm/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 2 /sys/i386/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 32 /sys/ia64/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 32 /sys/mips/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU MAXSMPCPU /sys/powerpc/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 2 /sys/sparc64/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 16 /sys/sun4v/include/param.h:#define MAXCPU 32 (almost 2y ago for x86) -- wbr, pluknetReceived on Wed Sep 22 2010 - 09:41:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC