On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:36 AM, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > Hummm. Patching 4BSD to use the same route as ULE may be the best solution > for now if that is easiest. Alternatively, you could change 4BSD's > sched_add() to not try to kick other CPUs until smp_started is true. At first I thought that it was a consequence of the way it does CPU affinity, but now I see that it shortcuts if smp_started is not true. How about something like the following for 4BSD? --- sched_4bsd.c (revision 220222) +++ sched_4bsd.c (working copy) _at__at_ -1242,14 +1242,14 _at__at_ } TD_SET_RUNQ(td); - if (td->td_pinned != 0) { + if (smp_started && td->td_pinned != 0) { cpu = td->td_lastcpu; ts->ts_runq = &runq_pcpu[cpu]; single_cpu = 1; CTR3(KTR_RUNQ, "sched_add: Put td_sched:%p(td:%p) on cpu%d runq", ts, td, cpu); - } else if (td->td_flags & TDF_BOUND) { + } else if (smp_started && (td->td_flags & TDF_BOUND)) { /* Find CPU from bound runq. */ KASSERT(SKE_RUNQ_PCPU(ts), ("sched_add: bound td_sched not on cpu runq")); _at__at_ -1258,7 +1258,7 _at__at_ CTR3(KTR_RUNQ, "sched_add: Put td_sched:%p(td:%p) on cpu%d runq", ts, td, cpu); - } else if (ts->ts_flags & TSF_AFFINITY) { + } else if (smp_started && (ts->ts_flags & TSF_AFFINITY)) { /* Find a valid CPU for our cpuset */ cpu = sched_pickcpu(td); ts->ts_runq = &runq_pcpu[cpu]; The flow control is a bit awkward because of the multiple affinity/bound cpu cases. If somebody prefers the code to be structured differently I'd be open to suggestions. RyanReceived on Wed Apr 06 2011 - 15:08:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC