On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Best <arundel_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best <arundel_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> hi there, >> >> >> >> i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let >> >> tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include >> >> dir(s). >> >> >> >> i ran a test via >> >> >> >> make toolchains >> >> make MAKE_JUST_KERNELS=yes tinderbox >> >> >> >> and nothing seemed to go wrong with the extra warning enabled. i even found a >> >> missing include dir, which should be fixed by the attached patch. >> >> >> >> opinions? >> >> >> >> so far i've only tested this with gcc. i think someone on #freebsd-clang told >> >> me that -Wmissing-include-dirs is a noop for clang (for whatever reasons). >> > >> > make -f /etc/src.conf -VMODULES_OVERRIDE and make -f /etc/src.conf >> > -VMODULES_OVERRIDE say... (tinderbox should also really ignore these >> > files, but it doesn't currently)? > > otaku% make -f /etc/src.conf -VMODULES_OVERRIDE > netgraph/netgraph netgraph/socket netgraph/bluetooth/bluetooth netgraph/bluetooth/hci netgraph/bluetooth/l2cap netgraph/bluetooth/socket netgraph/bluetooth/ubt tmpfs sound/sound sound/driver/hda usb/uhid procfs pseudofs linux linprocfs linsysfs lindev usb/quirk geom opensolaris dtrace cyclic nfsclient krpc nfs_common nfslock > otaku% make -f /etc/make.conf -VMODULES_OVERRIDE > netgraph/netgraph netgraph/socket netgraph/bluetooth/bluetooth netgraph/bluetooth/hci netgraph/bluetooth/l2cap netgraph/bluetooth/socket netgraph/bluetooth/ubt tmpfs sound/sound sound/driver/hda usb/uhid procfs pseudofs linux linprocfs linsysfs lindev usb/quirk geom opensolaris dtrace cyclic nfsclient krpc nfs_common nfslock > > ...however i checked and tinderbox *does* ignore src.conf and make.conf. the > _.* log files show that modules were being build which are not returned by > the commands above. > > i think having this flag would be very useful, because it would force people to > make sure their include dirs are correct. > >> >> Sorry. Second invocation should have been make.conf, not src.conf. Ok then. I stand corrected for not having tested out my claim beforehand. Yes, I agree that adding this flag in the default set is a good idea. Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Thu Apr 07 2011 - 19:58:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC