Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA

From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:48:57 -0400
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Warren Block <wblock_at_wonkity.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>  On 04/20/2011 15:18, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with what Alexander is saying, but I'd like to take it a step
>>> further.  We should all be using [...] mount-by-label
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> When I first saw this on linux my gut reaction was "ewwww, different." But
>> now that I've worked with it a bit, I really like it. Doing this by default
>> in 9.0 would be a really useful step forward, and would allow greater
>> innovation down the road.
>>
>> Is there a handy tutorial somewhere for making this change in FreeBSD? Or
>> is it even possible to do in a rational way?
>>
>
> Not sure I understand the question.  I have a little article called FreeBSD
> Labeled Filesystems: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html
>
> It uses filesystem labels instead of device labels (except for swap). The
> differences are the utility used to create the labels and where the labels
> show up in /dev.
> _______________________________________________
>
>


These steps are used AFTER installations of the FreeBSD . To have them
selectable DURING installation is a much more desired structure .

Also thank you very much for your articles .


Thank you very much .


Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Received on Thu Apr 21 2011 - 00:49:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC