Re: ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers

From: Test Rat <ttsestt_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:19:24 +0400
John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> writes:

> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:23:29 pm Test Rat wrote:
>> John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:49:24 am Test Rat wrote:
>> >> Doug Barton <dougb_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > On 08/02/2011 15:06, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> >> On Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:49:52 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> >> >>> on 19/07/2011 18:16 John Baldwin said the following:
>> >> >>>> Hmm, can you get devinfo -r output from a working kernel with ichwd 
> loaded?  
>> >> >>>> You might be able to just build the kernel with 'nooptions 
> NEW_PCIB'.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I believe that I've got a similar problem with amdsbwd(4).
>> >> >>> It needs some resources (I/O ports) that belong to ACPI.
>> >> >>> The problem is that the driver attaches to isa bus which is under
>> >> >>> isab->pci->pcib and those particular resources are not assigned to 
> the Host-PCI
>> >> >>> bridge.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I think that you already made a suggestion that perhaps isa bus 
> should  directly
>> >> >>> attach to acpi bus when acpi is available.  Not sure if there are any
>> >> >>> alternative approaches.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Can you try this:
>> >> >
>> >> > Not so much. :) the first and last patches I can apply to HEAD by hand,
>> >> > but /sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c is only 387 lines long, so I'm not
>> >> > even sure where to start.
>> >> 
>> >>   $ svn cat 
> svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c | wc -l
>> >>   531
>> >> 
>> >> No difference here on ICH9, ichwd(4) still doesn't attach.
>> >
>> > Can you add some printfs to see if the new method is being called in
>> > acpi_pcib_alloc_resource() and if it is failing when it is called?
>> 
>> rman_reserve_resource() fails with SYS_RES_MEMORY for isab0 when ichwd0
>> tries to attach. And acpi_alloc_sysres() is not called when isab0 or
>> isa0 are attached.
>> 
>>   isab0: found ICH9 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH9 watchdog timer
>>   ichwd0: <Intel ICH9 watchdog timer> on isa0
>>   isab0: found ICH9 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH9 watchdog timer
>>   acpi_alloc_resource::acpi_alloc_sysres(child->nameunit=ichwd0, 
> type=SYS_RES_IOPORT, *rid=0, start=1072, end=1079, count=8, flags=6) 
> res=0xfffffe0007fed380 RF_ACTIVE activated
>>   pcib0: allocated type 4 (0x430-0x437) for rid 0 of ichwd0
>>   acpi_alloc_resource::acpi_alloc_sysres(child->nameunit=ichwd0, 
> type=SYS_RES_IOPORT, *rid=1, start=1120, end=1151, count=32, flags=6) 
> res=0xfffffe0007fed400 RF_ACTIVE activated
>>   pcib0: allocated type 4 (0x460-0x47f) for rid 1 of ichwd0
>>   acpi_pcib_acpi_alloc_resource::acpi_alloc_sysres(child->nameunit=isab0, 
> type=SYS_RES_MEMORY, *rid=0, start=4275172368, end=4275172371, count=4, 
> flags=6) res=0 failed to reserve
>>   ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers
>
> Hmm, so it is called, it just fails when it is called.  The range is 
> 0xfed1f410 - 0xfed1f413.  Can you verify that that is in the 'ACPI memory I/O' 
> range in devinfo -u output?

It doesn't seem to be there (minus lines = hostres disabled).

   acpi0
       I/O ports:
           0x400-0x4bf
           0x4d0-0x4d1
       I/O memory addresses:
           0xfed10000-0xfed1dfff
           0xfed20000-0xfed8ffff
     pcib0
       pci0
         isab0
  -          I/O memory addresses:
  -              0xfed1f410-0xfed1f413
           isa0
  -          ichwd0
  -              ACPI I/O ports:
  -                  0x430-0x437
  -                  0x460-0x47f
Received on Wed Aug 03 2011 - 16:19:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:16 UTC