On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:19:24 pm Test Rat wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> writes: > > > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:23:29 pm Test Rat wrote: > >> John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> writes: > >> > >> > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:49:24 am Test Rat wrote: > >> >> Doug Barton <dougb_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > On 08/02/2011 15:06, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> >> On Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:49:52 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> >> >>> on 19/07/2011 18:16 John Baldwin said the following: > >> >> >>>> Hmm, can you get devinfo -r output from a working kernel with ichwd > > loaded? > >> >> >>>> You might be able to just build the kernel with 'nooptions > > NEW_PCIB'. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I believe that I've got a similar problem with amdsbwd(4). > >> >> >>> It needs some resources (I/O ports) that belong to ACPI. > >> >> >>> The problem is that the driver attaches to isa bus which is under > >> >> >>> isab->pci->pcib and those particular resources are not assigned to > > the Host-PCI > >> >> >>> bridge. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I think that you already made a suggestion that perhaps isa bus > > should directly > >> >> >>> attach to acpi bus when acpi is available. Not sure if there are any > >> >> >>> alternative approaches. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Can you try this: > >> >> > > >> >> > Not so much. :) the first and last patches I can apply to HEAD by hand, > >> >> > but /sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c is only 387 lines long, so I'm not > >> >> > even sure where to start. > >> >> > >> >> $ svn cat > > svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c | wc -l > >> >> 531 > >> >> > >> >> No difference here on ICH9, ichwd(4) still doesn't attach. > >> > > >> > Can you add some printfs to see if the new method is being called in > >> > acpi_pcib_alloc_resource() and if it is failing when it is called? > >> > >> rman_reserve_resource() fails with SYS_RES_MEMORY for isab0 when ichwd0 > >> tries to attach. And acpi_alloc_sysres() is not called when isab0 or > >> isa0 are attached. > >> > >> isab0: found ICH9 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH9 watchdog timer > >> ichwd0: <Intel ICH9 watchdog timer> on isa0 > >> isab0: found ICH9 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH9 watchdog timer > >> acpi_alloc_resource::acpi_alloc_sysres(child->nameunit=ichwd0, > > type=SYS_RES_IOPORT, *rid=0, start=1072, end=1079, count=8, flags=6) > > res=0xfffffe0007fed380 RF_ACTIVE activated > >> pcib0: allocated type 4 (0x430-0x437) for rid 0 of ichwd0 > >> acpi_alloc_resource::acpi_alloc_sysres(child->nameunit=ichwd0, > > type=SYS_RES_IOPORT, *rid=1, start=1120, end=1151, count=32, flags=6) > > res=0xfffffe0007fed400 RF_ACTIVE activated > >> pcib0: allocated type 4 (0x460-0x47f) for rid 1 of ichwd0 > >> acpi_pcib_acpi_alloc_resource::acpi_alloc_sysres(child->nameunit=isab0, > > type=SYS_RES_MEMORY, *rid=0, start=4275172368, end=4275172371, count=4, > > flags=6) res=0 failed to reserve > >> ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers > > > > Hmm, so it is called, it just fails when it is called. The range is > > 0xfed1f410 - 0xfed1f413. Can you verify that that is in the 'ACPI memory I/O' > > range in devinfo -u output? > > It doesn't seem to be there (minus lines = hostres disabled). > > acpi0 > I/O ports: > 0x400-0x4bf > 0x4d0-0x4d1 > I/O memory addresses: > 0xfed10000-0xfed1dfff > 0xfed20000-0xfed8ffff > pcib0 > pci0 > isab0 > - I/O memory addresses: > - 0xfed1f410-0xfed1f413 > isa0 > - ichwd0 > - ACPI I/O ports: > - 0x430-0x437 > - 0x460-0x47f Hmmm, so your BIOS just outright lies then? :( Can you check devinfo -u with 'debug.acpi.disabled=hostres' to see where those memory addresses show up? -- John BaldwinReceived on Wed Aug 03 2011 - 19:38:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:16 UTC