On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could > > > > be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the cv_wait > > > > call in cdevpriv data destructor ? You cannot have a thread doing e.g. > > > > read on the file descriptor while destructor is run. > > > > > > > > > > What will prevent you from having a thread stuck in read(), while an another > > > one close() the fd ? > > > > > Nothing, but file reference count goes to zero only after the thread > > stuck in read is unstuck. Cdevpriv destructor is run only when file > > reference count becomes zero, i.e. there can be no any accessing threads, > > and new accesses are impossible since file descriptors also own references > > on the file. > > Right, I was a bit confused, this part can be removed. > > Regards, > > Olivier Here is a new version of the patch mostly reworked by Olivier, It doesn't duplicate anymore the devq, and fix all that have been spotted here previously. http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/devctl_multi_open.diff bonus, it removes the needless giant lock regards, Bapt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC