On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On 01.12.2011 09:37, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >> On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>> on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: >>>> > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. >>>> > Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself. >>>> >>>> on 27/11/2011 19:09 Alan Cox said the following: >>>> > vm_page_alloc_contig() should be used instead. >>>> >>>> My take on the patch: >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/vbox-10.patch >>>> This is for head only, no check for FreeBSD version. >>> >>> Actually, I did the same thing last night: >>> >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-freebsd-memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c >>> >>> This is a drop-in replacement for the patch. The only practical >>> difference I see from yours is I used VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT instead of >>> VM_ALLOC_NORMAL. I believe this function may be used in interrupt >>> context. FYI, I tried FreeBSD 9 and Fedora 10 without problem. >> >> Thanks a lot for both patches! Could you please as usual reply and >> tell >> me if it is okay to send this patch upstream under MIT license? >> >> Once there is some positive feedback I will commit both patches to >> the ports tree. > > Patch has been send upstream: > > > https://www.virtualbox.org/pipermail/vbox-dev/2011-December/004842.html Patches have been committed upstream. Thanks a lot guys! https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/39521 -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/Received on Mon Dec 05 2011 - 11:57:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC