Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2011-11-23 19:26, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:58 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > >> I don't know if Dimitry tried this, but you could also try the > >> "nolockd" option, so that byte range locking is done locally in > >> the client and avoids the NLM. > >> > >> Good luck with it and please let us know how it goes, rick > > > > This seems to allow SVN 1.7 to do whatever nonsense it is trying to > > do. > > I've modified my fstab on the test host in the cluster to: > > > > dumpster:/vol/volshscratch /dumpster/scratch nfs > > rw,soft,intr,bg,nolockd,nosuid 0 0 > > > > Removing soft,intr had no effect. This, I suspect will be > > problematic > > for clusteradm_at_ if we start updating hosts in the cluster. > > A very late addition to this: I got Subversion 1.7 to work properly > over > NFSv3, by making sure rpc.lockd runs on both server and client. > > E.g, set rpc_lockd_enable to YES in rc.conf; this is off by default, > even if you have nfs_client_enable/nfs_server_enable set to YES. and rpc_statd_enable="YES" on all systems, as well. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Tue Dec 13 2011 - 14:53:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC