On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 07:53 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2011-11-23 19:26, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:58 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > > >> I don't know if Dimitry tried this, but you could also try the > > >> "nolockd" option, so that byte range locking is done locally in > > >> the client and avoids the NLM. > > >> > > >> Good luck with it and please let us know how it goes, rick > > > > > > This seems to allow SVN 1.7 to do whatever nonsense it is trying to > > > do. > > > I've modified my fstab on the test host in the cluster to: > > > > > > dumpster:/vol/volshscratch /dumpster/scratch nfs > > > rw,soft,intr,bg,nolockd,nosuid 0 0 > > > > > > Removing soft,intr had no effect. This, I suspect will be > > > problematic > > > for clusteradm_at_ if we start updating hosts in the cluster. > > > > A very late addition to this: I got Subversion 1.7 to work properly > > over > > NFSv3, by making sure rpc.lockd runs on both server and client. > > > > E.g, set rpc_lockd_enable to YES in rc.conf; this is off by default, > > even if you have nfs_client_enable/nfs_server_enable set to YES. > > and rpc_statd_enable="YES" on all systems, as well. > > > ________________ Thanks for this btw. :-) SeanReceived on Tue Dec 13 2011 - 22:18:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC