Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

From: Johan Hendriks <joh.hendriks_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:49:28 +0100
Alexander Leidinger schreef:
> Hi,
>
> while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place. Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel free to go to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice and have a look what can be improved. The page is far from perfect and needs some additional people which are willing to improve it.
>
> This is only part of the problem. A tuning page in the wiki - which could be referenced from the benchmark page - would be great too. Any volunteers? A first step would be to take he tuning-man-page and wikify it. Other tuning sources are welcome too.
>
> Every FreeBSD dev with a wiki account can hand out write access to the wiki. The benchmark page gives contributor-access. If someone wants write access create a FirstnameLastname account and ask here for contributor-access.
>
> Don't worry if you think your english is not good enough, even some one-word notes can help (and _my_ english got already corrected by other people on the benchmark page).
>
> Bye,
> Alexander.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"

Nice page, but one thing i do not get is the following.

[quote]
If you compare FreeBSD / GCC 4.2.1 against, for example, Ubuntu / GCC 
4.7 then the results are unlikely to tell you anything meaningful about 
FreeBSD vs Ubuntu.
[/quote]

That is a little strange in my opinion.
It tells me that FreeBSD falls more and more behind on Linux.
The reason is or could be that FreeBSD cannot or will not include GCC 
4.7 and that FreeBSD will not be on par with Linux anymore.
To compare it with Formula1 cars.
If Mercedes decide to use the engine from 2 seasons back (the engine 
version 4.2.1) in there 2012 car, and Ferrari uses there new Engine 
(version 4.7).
Can we not compare them anymore because of the decission from Mercedes 
to use the old engine?
No we just say, if you want to win a race, get the Ferrari.

It is the reallity, FreeBSD uses 4.2.1 as there compiler!!!
If you tune up FreeBSD to use the GCC 4.7 compiler, or downgrade linux 
to 4.2.1, then that will tell me nothing about FreeBSD vs Linux.

I my opinion, you benchmark the latest release of Linux, FreeBSD, 
Solaris, Windows and whatever OS you want to compare!
You want to benchmark the release and not a tuned version against a 
standard version.
And that in general are the versions most of us users will use.

And what if in the future LLVM gets on par with Linux, is it stil fair 
to compare FreeBSD with Linux?
Or do we say, well we are on par, but it is not fair, yes we used the 
latest releases, but you can not blame Linux because they are still 
using GCC.
No what we will see then are haleluja blogs that FreeBSD is on par with 
Linux.

For me peformance is not a show stopper, and for the most of us i think 
it is not.
FreeBSD for me is a clean system that does the job perfect and has a 
very helpful community.

regards,
Johan
Received on Wed Dec 21 2011 - 20:49:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC