On Monday 28 February 2011 14:37:31 John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, February 26, 2011 10:25:41 am Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while working on a wireless driver for a Cardbus card I stumbled over > > an issue which bugs me quite a bit. > > > > The device: > > > > % none3_at_pci0:22:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x107f1043 chip=0x02011814 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > > Loading the module attaches nicely to the device: > > > > # kldload if_ral > > % ral0: <Ralink Technology RT2560> mem 0xf4800000-0xf4801fff irq 16 at > device 0.0 on cardbus0 > > % ral0: MAC/BBP RT2560 (rev 0x04), RF RT2525 > > % ral0: [ITHREAD] > > # pciconf -l > > % ral0_at_pci0:22:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x107f1043 chip=0x02011814 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > > Though, kldunload doesn't detach the device, it doesn't even call the > > module's detach function. > > > > # kldunload if_ral > > # pciconf -l > > % ral0_at_pci0:22:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x107f1043 chip=0x02011814 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > # kldstat > > % Id Refs Address Size Name > > % 1 27 0xffffffff80100000 e640a0 kernel > > # ifconfig ral0 > > % ral0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 2290 > > % ether 00:0e:a6:a6:1b:70 > > % media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) > > % status: no carrier > > > > And of course trying to use the device at that point will result in > > instant panics. Playing around a bit I've noticed that changing the bus > > name in: > > > > % DRIVER_MODULE(ral, pci, ral_pci_driver, ral_devclass, 0, 0); > > > > from pci to cardbus makes a big difference. On module unload the detach > > function is then called as expected. So, question is, are we doing some > > too strict checks on module unload while matching the bus? Or is this > > expected behavior and the drivers are supposed to indiciated that they > > support both pci and cardbus? I don't see the later anywhere in tree. > > This sounds like a bug in how the inheritance stuff in new-bus drivers works. > The DRIVER_MODULE() line for cardbus is implicit because the 'cardbus' driver > inherits from the generic 'pci' bus driver. That is how kldload works > correctly. It seems we need to do some extra plumbing for the kldunload case. > > The bug is that 189574 only patched the devclass add driver path, not the > delete driver path. Try this: That fixes it, thanks! kldunload now successfully calls the driver's detach method. > Index: subr_bus.c > =================================================================== > --- subr_bus.c (revision 219096) > +++ subr_bus.c (working copy) > _at__at_ -987,11 +987,13 _at__at_ devclass_find(const char *classname) > * is called by devclass_add_driver to accomplish the recursive > * notification of all the children classes of dc, as well as dc. > * Each layer will have BUS_DRIVER_ADDED() called for all instances of > - * the devclass. We do a full search here of the devclass list at > - * each iteration level to save storing children-lists in the devclass > - * structure. If we ever move beyond a few dozen devices doing this, > - * we may need to reevaluate... > + * the devclass. > * > + * We do a full search here of the devclass list at each iteration > + * level to save storing children-lists in the devclass structure. If > + * we ever move beyond a few dozen devices doing this, we may need to > + * reevaluate... > + * > * _at_param dc the devclass to edit > * _at_param driver the driver that was just added > */ > _at__at_ -1085,6 +1087,78 _at__at_ devclass_add_driver(devclass_t dc, driver_t *drive > } > > /** > + * _at_brief Register that a device driver has been deleted from a devclass > + * > + * Register that a device driver has been removed from a devclass. > + * This is called by devclass_delete_driver to accomplish the > + * recursive notification of all the children classes of busclass, as > + * well as busclass. Each layer will attempt to detach the driver > + * from any devices that are children of the bus's devclass. The function > + * will return an error if a device fails to detach. > + * > + * We do a full search here of the devclass list at each iteration > + * level to save storing children-lists in the devclass structure. If > + * we ever move beyond a few dozen devices doing this, we may need to > + * reevaluate... > + * > + * _at_param busclass the devclass of the parent bus > + * _at_param dc the devclass of the driver being deleted > + * _at_param driver the driver being deleted > + */ > +static int > +devclass_driver_deleted(devclass_t busclass, devclass_t dc, driver_t *driver) > +{ > + devclass_t parent; > + device_t dev; > + int error, i; > + > + /* > + * Disassociate from any devices. We iterate through all the > + * devices in the devclass of the driver and detach any which are > + * using the driver and which have a parent in the devclass which > + * we are deleting from. > + * > + * Note that since a driver can be in multiple devclasses, we > + * should not detach devices which are not children of devices in > + * the affected devclass. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < dc->maxunit; i++) { > + if (dc->devices[i]) { > + dev = dc->devices[i]; > + if (dev->driver == driver && dev->parent && > + dev->parent->devclass == busclass) { > + if ((error = device_detach(dev)) != 0) > + return (error); > + device_set_driver(dev, NULL); > + BUS_PROBE_NOMATCH(dev->parent, dev); > + devnomatch(dev); > + dev->flags |= DF_DONENOMATCH; > + } > + } > + } > + > + /* > + * Walk through the children classes. Since we only keep a > + * single parent pointer around, we walk the entire list of > + * devclasses looking for children. We set the > + * DC_HAS_CHILDREN flag when a child devclass is created on > + * the parent, so we only walk the list for those devclasses > + * that have children. > + */ > + if (!(busclass->flags & DC_HAS_CHILDREN)) > + return (0); > + parent = busclass; > + TAILQ_FOREACH(busclass, &devclasses, link) { > + if (busclass->parent == parent) { > + error = devclass_driver_deleted(busclass, dc, driver); > + if (error) > + return (error); > + } > + } > + return (0); > +} > + > +/** > * _at_brief Delete a device driver from a device class > * > * Delete a device driver from a devclass. This is normally called > _at__at_ -1103,8 +1177,6 _at__at_ devclass_delete_driver(devclass_t busclass, driver > { > devclass_t dc = devclass_find(driver->name); > driverlink_t dl; > - device_t dev; > - int i; > int error; > > PDEBUG(("%s from devclass %s", driver->name, DEVCLANAME(busclass))); > _at__at_ -1126,30 +1198,9 _at__at_ devclass_delete_driver(devclass_t busclass, driver > return (ENOENT); > } > > - /* > - * Disassociate from any devices. We iterate through all the > - * devices in the devclass of the driver and detach any which are > - * using the driver and which have a parent in the devclass which > - * we are deleting from. > - * > - * Note that since a driver can be in multiple devclasses, we > - * should not detach devices which are not children of devices in > - * the affected devclass. > - */ > - for (i = 0; i < dc->maxunit; i++) { > - if (dc->devices[i]) { > - dev = dc->devices[i]; > - if (dev->driver == driver && dev->parent && > - dev->parent->devclass == busclass) { > - if ((error = device_detach(dev)) != 0) > - return (error); > - device_set_driver(dev, NULL); > - BUS_PROBE_NOMATCH(dev->parent, dev); > - devnomatch(dev); > - dev->flags |= DF_DONENOMATCH; > - } > - } > - } > + error = devclass_driver_deleted(busclass, dc, driver); > + if (error != 0) > + return (error); > > TAILQ_REMOVE(&busclass->drivers, dl, link); > free(dl, M_BUS); -- BernhardReceived on Mon Feb 28 2011 - 19:06:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC