2011/7/8 Marius Strobl <marius_at_alchemy.franken.de>: > In order to have a result which can be compared with the base BIND. > Whether bind98 works or works without the ISC atomic operations says > nothing about the bind96 port or the base version. Okey... > Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling. > Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again. I started named from ports (dns/bind96) at Sat Jul 9 10:08:41 MSD, and it worked properly till Sun Jul 10 22:25:41 MSD. At 22:25:41 I restarted bind from base system with your sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2. >From this moment till today, 15:57:05 he crashed 3 times: Jul 10 23:19:19 sunrise kernel: pid 45352 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 6 Jul 11 14:52:20 sunrise kernel: pid 52032 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 6 Jul 11 15:14:15 sunrise kernel: pid 71300 (named), uid 53: exited on signal 6 To make to ensure proper operation of bind from ports, I ran it again at 15:57:05, and, I think, we need to wait several days. -- MATPOCKuHReceived on Mon Jul 11 2011 - 10:10:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC