Hi, [re-sent publicly, I did not "Replied-to-all":)] On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl > <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> >>> For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_ >>> patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is >>> particularly interesting. But it is not likely to happen in FreeBSD >>> where FreeBSD committers are clearly more free than other at >>> checking-in un-publicly-reviewed stuff (especially _bad_ stuff). >>> >>> This would of course apply even to long-time committers, no matter how >>> it hurt their ego (which I definitively do not care about). >>> >> >> As a long time GCC committer, I think that you have grossly >> over-simplified the GCC review process and how a submitted >> patch is approved for committing. >> > Yes. > Just to provide information more information than these sterile mails, here is the gcc contribution guidelines: http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html - ArnaudReceived on Mon Jul 11 2011 - 19:50:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC