On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl> wrote: > Hi all, > > * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > Ah, it seems SDL also calls GIO_KEYMAP. Just rebuilding SDL should fix >> > this. I promised to add a message to UPDATING as well, so I'll also >> > mention SDL should be rebuilt as well. >> >> I consider this as a very strong argument to keep the existing ioctl >> as is, and provide new ioctl that takes new table. > > I've attached a patch that should restore binary compatibility. I first > thought this wasn't really needed, because most applications would use > K_RAW instead of K_XLATE anyway. > > Just breaking binary compatibility with kbdcontrol(1) wouldn't have been > too bad, but it turns out things like SDL use this as well. I've > attached a patch that should restore binary compatibility. Anyone > interested in testing this before I commit it to SVN? Replying to ancient history, it looks like this patch never got committed? The Debian kFreeBSD folks have run into a similar issue: http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00238.html proposing =============== Upstream could do it properly, without ABI breaking, i.e. by #define GIO_KEYMAP_OLD _IOR('k', 6, keymap_t) #define PIO_KEYMAP_OLD _IOW('k', 7, keymap_t) ... #define GIO_KEYMAP _IO('k', 16) #define PIO_KEYMAP _IO('k', 17) =============== Something to keep the ABI between 8 and 9 is probably still useful, even at this juncture. -Ben KadukReceived on Fri Jun 17 2011 - 22:49:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC