On 06/20/2011 13:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:19:36 -1000 (HST) > Jeff Roberson<jroberson_at_jroberson.net> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> Kirk, Peter and I have been working hard on SUJ. We still have a few bugs >> related to snapshots but we fixed the couple of potential corruption >> problems that came up over the last year. If you are not currently using >> SUJ I implore you to do so and report any problems you may find.. We need >> to get better coverage if we are going to enable it for 9.0 which I think >> everyone would like to see. >> >> I will send another update when it is safe to use SUJ + snapshots. >> > All I can say is that I've been using SUJ since day one and it's saved > my bacon any number of times. > > In the last week alone I've had to reset my box 4 times due to hangs in > X and it sure was nice having SUJ recover my file systems in fractions > of a minute rather than waiting 30 minutes for fsck. > We've defaulted to having it enabled for the past several months now on our PC-BSD 9-snapshots, and it's been working great. Haven't had any complaints or problems reported from our testers. -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software iXsystemsReceived on Mon Jun 20 2011 - 17:30:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC