Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

From: Peter Holm <peter_at_holm.cc>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:21:02 +0200
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
> > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast:
> > 
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt
> 
> Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702.
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/tmpfs.7.patch

Looks good. The mmap(2) test doesn't panic any more, nor does any of
the other TMPFS tests I have.

- Peter
Received on Sat Jun 25 2011 - 15:21:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC