Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything! Adrian On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar_at_ujf-grenoble.fr>wrote: > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really > > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few > bugs > > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions. > I'd > > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) support in > > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I haven't > > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in any way. > > > > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the results. > > > > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n support, but I > > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy operation in any > way. > > > > Are you interested by tests on an old atheros card (Atheros 5212, AR2413 > mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5) ? >Received on Sat Mar 05 2011 - 10:27:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC