On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Alexander Best <arundel_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu Mar 10 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Alexander Best <arundel_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> > hi there, >> > >> > just wanted to ask what the current situation on WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL is? it >> > seems the option gets completely ignored after a recent commit. >> > >> > should src.conf be adjusted to mention that WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL == noop or >> > should the option be completely removed? >> > >> > also in usr.sbin/Makefile, the sysinstall entry should be moved upwards to the >> > other non-optional build directories imo. >> >> The build didn't even really function when specifying >> WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL before Nate's recent commits -- so why worry about >> the state of things? > > due to inconsistency? src.conf says WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL will not build > sysinstall(1). that's obviously wrong. I think this context was forgotten: http://markmail.org/message/fk2xqlrtvljjo3rf Also: $ find /usr/src/ -name 'Makefile*' | xargs grep WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL $ echo $? 1 $ svn info /usr/src/ | grep Revision | sed 's,Revision: ,,' 219120 Doesn't look like this sentinel is honored anywhere. Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Thu Mar 10 2011 - 23:23:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC