Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011/3/25 Jason Helfman <jhelfman_at_e-e.com>:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:18:24PM +0000, Julien Laffaye thus spake:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti <gahr_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> if you are going to test on current please notice that make install
>>>> will overwrite /usr/lib/libpkg so pkg_* tools won't work anymore.
>>>>
>>>> We will workaround that later by renaming our lib libpkgng for the test
>>>> phase.
>>>>
>>>> But I won't be able to do that before monday.
>>>
>>> I was: http://people.freebsd.org/~gahr/pkgng-0.1-alpha1.diff
>>
>> Commited! Thanks!
>
> It would be great to be able to have a repo and all of the functionality of
> this tool against an internal portstree/INDEX supported, as well.
>
> We have an internal portstree that we don't update on a daily basis, however
> we do have a local category as part of the standard portstree. We are able
> to build an INDEX off of this combination and support Tinderbox package
> building and updating from this INDEX that has the entire tree.
>
> From what I read, it appears that support is already present, but not
> absolutely certain.
>
> Looking forward to testing :)
> -jgh
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>>
>

Hope I have correctly understood the question :). but I you are able
to build packages (from tinderbox for example) with pkgng you are able
to build a repository usable (custom one) just pkg repo
./the_path_to_the_repo and you are done.

regards,
Bapt