On 03/26/11 19:19, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:53:52 +0100 > "O. Hartmann"<ohartman_at_mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> On 03/26/11 14:48, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:44:52PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> On 26.03.2011 11:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>>> on 26/03/2011 11:10 O. Hartmann said the following: >>>>>> Updating ports and source of my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 host, equipted >>>>>> with a >>>>>> AMD/ATi HD4830 graphics board driven by X11 xf86-video-ati driver (which >>>>>> has >>>>>> been recently update as far as I saw), >>>>>> resulted this morning in an 'un-login-able' box. >>>>>> >>>>>> I see the xdm-login requester, but after successfully login, I see for a >>>>>> second >>>>>> the desktop (windowmaker), but X11 immediately dies and resets to the xdm >>>>>> requester again. >>>>> Are you subscribed to our x11 list? It's quite low volume. >>>>> Please see recent messages in its archive, perhaps they could help you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> No, I'm actually not subscribed to that list. Since the problem occured >>>> since yesterday's update out of the blue, I thought it could be more >>>> FreeBSD related than X11 related. But I will reply to the X11 list as >>>> well. I simply forgot in my desperate pain, sorry. >>>> >>> See >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2011-March/010737.html >> >> I downgraded the AMD/ATi driver to version xf86-video-ati-6.14.0_1, I >> desperately need my boxes since I have to finish work. >> Three different types of AMD/ATi graphics cards out of the same product >> class are not working with the new xf86-video-ati-6.14.1 and as the >> above mentioned link suggests, the solution is well known. I was >> wondering how this port could be so easily slipped into the repository ... >> >> Since the patch Jun-uk Kim referred to is a GIT patch and it seems to >> work, is there a 'simple' way without installing the GIT stuff from >> ports to patch the defective port? >> > Have you looked at the link? The patch is trivial and can easily be > applied by hand. > Yes I did.Received on Sat Mar 26 2011 - 17:29:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC