Am Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:49:50 -0800 schrieb allan_at_stokes.ca: > Hello everyone, Hi, (I'll shorten this a bit, because I don't have opinions on everything you wrote) > I'm either not brave enough or insane enough to put my FreeBSD system > volume onto the ZFS mirror, as much as that seems kind of cool. > Plain old UFS on a separate drive for me. Have others had success > with ZFS system volumes? Since 8.2 I can confirm that ZFS was stable enough for me. But I have to admit that I'm still a bit sceptical because (even it's been long time ago) once I ended up with a broken zpool that spewed panics on zpool initialization. That was a horrible experience that I won't forget that easily. > However, programs such as startx and portupgrade are failing with the > message "libz.so.5 not found". I know I can fix this with an evil > symlink, but that doesn't seem right, and what else is broken? Is > there not a facility in portupgrade to scan my live dependencies and > warn me of breakage? I have not encountered such a beast in my > gleanings to date. There is a little helper in port sysutils/bsdadminscripts called pkg_libchk. I use this tool very often like this: pkg_libchk -qo > broken.txt And then I cat it to portmaster: portmaster -d `cat broken.txt` I don't know anymore how the portmaster step works with portupgrade, you need to figure this out by yourself. -- Martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC