On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:18:13 -0700 Manfred Antar <null_at_pozo.com> wrote: > At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700 > >Manfred Antar <null_at_pozo.com> wrote: > > > >> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current. > >> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with > >> uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away. > > > >Actually, binutils built just fine for me just now without setting > >UNAME_r under current. > > Built fine for me too. But when I tried to compile gcc45 no go > recompiled binutils with uname_r 9.0-CURRENT, And gcc45 built fine. > so my assumption was that something gets messed up with the binutils > and gcc45 when built with current. Yes, I see what you mean. Getting the same thing here. -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads_at_cox.netReceived on Sun Oct 09 2011 - 23:54:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC