On 10/10/11 03:18, Manfred Antar wrote: > At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700 >> Manfred Antar<null_at_pozo.com> wrote: >> >>> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current. >>> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with >>> uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away. >> >> Actually, binutils built just fine for me just now without setting >> UNAME_r under current. >> >> -- >> Conrad J. Sabatier >> conrads_at_cox.net > > Built fine for me too. But when I tried to compile gcc45 no go > recompiled binutils with uname_r 9.0-CURRENT, And gcc45 built fine. > so my assumption was that something gets messed up with the binutils and gcc45 when built with current. Managed it. Somehow I maneged to build the binutils without setting the UNAME_r kludge. I confused myself and the system. Thanks. I think, watching this is a very good opportunity to learn by doing, how things work. OliverReceived on Mon Oct 10 2011 - 04:51:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC