On 10/22/2011 12:07, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет: >> On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}') >> >> 2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running >> svnversion. >> >> Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and >> more effective one already exists? :) > > I'm not an exert here, so I'm not sure which one and why did you call > "simple and more effective": Please read the rest of this thread, where the fact that svnversion does more than what 'svn info' does, and that people find the more that it does to be useful. So "simpler" is "one command, not 2 or more," and "more effective" is "provides more information, and people find that extra information useful." :) hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/Received on Sat Oct 22 2011 - 17:13:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC