On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/22/2011 12:07, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> 22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет: >>> On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}') >>> >>> 2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running >>> svnversion. >>> >>> Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and >>> more effective one already exists? :) >> >> I'm not an exert here, so I'm not sure which one and why did you call >> "simple and more effective": > > Please read the rest of this thread, where the fact that svnversion does > more than what 'svn info' does, and that people find the more that it > does to be useful. > > So "simpler" is "one command, not 2 or more," and "more effective" is > "provides more information, and people find that extra information > useful." :) I was just offering an alternative (improperly timed), and as dougb_at_ pointed out, svnversion works better. Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Sat Oct 22 2011 - 17:24:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC