Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7

From: Luchesar V. ILIEV <luchesar.iliev_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:55:23 +0300
On 24/10/2011 14:59, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:31:25 pm Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
>> Speaking of that, and in the context of the recursion that svnversion
>> does, something else comes to my mind...
>>
>> svnversion is currently executed in ${SRCDIR}/sys, so the revision
>> number is relevant only to the kernel sources. But FreeBSD is not just a
>> kernel, unlike Linux, so wouldn't it make more sense to actually check
>> the revision directly at ${SRCDIR}, thus catching possible different
>> revisions in other parts of the base system source tree?
> 
> Please no.  That makes svnversion take a _lot_ longer.  We used to do that,
> but changed it.  Also, the kernel build does not use any sources outside
> of sys/, so for the kernel an svnversion of sys/ is perfectly reasonable.
> 

Sorry, it's my fault not noticing that it used to be that way. I also
guess that the topic has been discussed, so I'm sure all the pros and
cons have been well weighted. Thanks for the clarification.

Cheers,
Luchesar
Received on Mon Oct 24 2011 - 11:55:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC