On 09/01/11 17:23, Matt Thyer wrote: > On Sep 2, 2011 5:25 AM, "Warren Block"<wblock_at_wonkity.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote: >>> >>>> Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image > ? > >> It seems wrong to have gptboot just ignore backup GPT data, but it could > be an option. Can it actually do something if the backup GPT differs, or is > it testing for an error that can't be handled? >> >> MBR didn't have backup data ("Luxury! Pure luxury!"), and it did okay. > > A custom hacked gptboot just for the memstick? > > Sorry.... Been working with Linux too much lately. > > Probably the real solution is to use MBR and have BSDinstall and the install > kernel support UFS labels. Space on the memstick is not an issue. Both support that. The issue is makefs(8). -NathanReceived on Thu Sep 01 2011 - 20:29:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC