Re: cvsup broken on amd64?

On 9 September 2011 06:33, Oliver Lehmann <lehmann_at_ans-netz.de> wrote:
>
> Mike Tancsa <mike_at_sentex.net> wrote:
>
>> Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is
>> in the base ?
>
> I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question.
> If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or there should be a
> statement that it will not work with FreeBSD 9 on at least amd64 or we
> will have other users complaining about the same at least when
> 9.0 RELEASE is out - right?

The cvsup port is normally used now only for cvsupd, for which there
is no csupd analog. As far as I know, and perhaps mux (CC'd) could
confirm every feature present in cvsup is present in csup-- and it's a
fair amount faster too.

Of course, cvsup could probably do with fixing, but for now csup is
literally a drop-in replacement; it'll read all your supfiles too.

Chris