On 09/11/11 13:31, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Sep-11 11:31:54 +0300, Andriy Gapon<avg_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> And I am actually wondering about -fno-unit-at-a-time option. >> In my opinion this is an anti-optimization option and it can actually increase >> a size of a final binary. In fact, it looks like the option was introduced to >> boot2 in r132870 in the year 2004, way before GCC 4.X switch, and it was >> introduced to avoid some optimizations that produced broken code. >> I wonder if there is any reason to keep using that option now. > > In any case, size isn't an issue for any of gptboot, gptzfsboot or > zfsboot (unlike boot2). For that matter, why do we need both > gptboot and gptzfsboot? It would be more convenient to have a > single GPT bootstrap that handled both UFS& ZFS. > It would be much more convenient, and also simplify adding installation onto ZFS partitions in the installer significantly. -NathanReceived on Sun Sep 11 2011 - 12:55:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC