Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

From: <perryh_at_pluto.rain.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:47:07 -0700

Eitan Adler <lists_at_eitanadler.com> wrote:

> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de>:
> > Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
> > 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ...
>
> FreeBSD XP anyone?

Are you sure there's a sufficient window of opportunity? :)

Received on Wed Sep 28 2011 - 04:48:38 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Taku YAMAMOTO: "Re: [Solved] FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems"
Previous message: Matthew Seaman: "Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 or 3?"
In reply to: Eitan Adler: "Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT"
Next in thread: Hartmann, O.: "Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT"
Reply: Hartmann, O.: "Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC