On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:06:21 +0100 Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson_at_ury.york.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 19:53 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hans, > > > > Why haven't those patches been committed? > > This patch is an absolute hack, and shouldn't be committed as it is. > > I would, however, appreciate some help in determining the correct > solution. The solution may well involve not suspending/resuming hpet(4) > or the other timers on the normal DEVICE_SUSPEND()/DEVICE_RESUME() path > but instead doing them as the last thing to be suspended, or it may Like the attached patches do? > instead involve reworking the USB code (and potentially other code) to > not need to sleep during suspend/resume. I don't know the right > solution, but would really like to work with somebody who does. > > Please also see the thread "Choosing between DELAY(useconds) and > pause()" on -current. > > Gavin > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" -- -|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku | __ < <taku_at_tackymt.homeip.net> - A chicken is an egg's way of producing more eggs. -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC