On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle <tim_at_kientzle.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a wrapper script that builds packages in a chroot environment >>> which happily runs on release 6 thru 9 and earlier 10 but fails with: >>> >>> tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory >>> >>> on a recent -CURRENT. >> >> libarchive does do an initial getvfsbyname() when you ask it >> to traverse a directory tree so that it can accurately handle later >> requests about mountpoints and filesystem types. This code >> is admittedly a little intricate. > > The problem most likely is the fact that all mountpoints are > exposed via chroot, thus, if it's checking to see if a mountpoint > exists, it may exist outside of the chroot. > I reviewed the code to refresh my memory. Some of what I said before was not quite right. Libarchive's directory traversal tracks information about the filesystem type so that clients such as bsdtar can efficiently skip synthetic filesystems (/dev or /proc) or network filesystems (NFS or SMB mounts). The net effect is something like this: For each file: stat() or lstat() or fstat() the file look up dev number in an internal cache if the dev number is new: fstatfs() the open fd to get the FS name getvfsbyname() to identify the FS type Unless there's a logic error in libarchive itself, this would suggest that somehow fstatfs() is returning a filesystem type that getvfsbyname() can't identify. Paul: What filesystem are you using? What does "mount" show? Does it work outside the chroot? TimReceived on Sun Aug 19 2012 - 18:01:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:29 UTC