Re: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat

From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:02:12 -0600
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas_at_bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>> I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the
>> standard procedure. I then get:
>>
>> # make check-old-libs
>>>>> Checking for old libraries
>> /lib/libz.so.5
>> #
>>
>> while sysutils/libchk shows:
>>
>> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5
>>         /usr/sbin/dtrace
>>         /usr/sbin/lockstat
>>
>> and indeed these two executables depend
>> on this library:
>>
>> # ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace
>> /usr/sbin/dtrace:
>>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
>>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
>>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
>>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
>>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
>>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000)
>>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000)
>> # ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat
>> /usr/sbin/lockstat:
>>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
>>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
>>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
>>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
>>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
>>         librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000)
>>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000)
>>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000)
>> #
>>
>> I see that these two executables are old:
>>
>> # ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  58976 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  72832 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat
>> #
>>
>> Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat
>> are obsolete and can be removed?
>>
> These 2 programs are part of the CDDL liscensed code.
>
> Do you have WITHOUT_CDDL defined in your src.conf or make.conf? If it
> is defined, then you can remove them.  Otherwise you'll need to
> determine why they are not being built/installed.
>
I had another look at cddl/usr.sbin/Makefile, and it only builds
lockstat and dtrace for i386, amd64, and powerpc.  It doesn't build
them for ia64.  So it is safe to remove them.

-- 
DISCLAIMER:

No electrons were mamedi while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Received on Wed Dec 12 2012 - 16:02:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC