Re: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat

From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:53 -0600
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas_at_bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the
> standard procedure. I then get:
>
> # make check-old-libs
>>>> Checking for old libraries
> /lib/libz.so.5
> #
>
> while sysutils/libchk shows:
>
> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5
>         /usr/sbin/dtrace
>         /usr/sbin/lockstat
>
> and indeed these two executables depend
> on this library:
>
> # ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace
> /usr/sbin/dtrace:
>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000)
>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000)
> # ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat
> /usr/sbin/lockstat:
>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
>         librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000)
>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000)
>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000)
> #
>
> I see that these two executables are old:
>
> # ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat
> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  58976 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace
> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  72832 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat
> #
>
> Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat
> are obsolete and can be removed?
>
These 2 programs are part of the CDDL liscensed code.

Do you have WITHOUT_CDDL defined in your src.conf or make.conf? If it
is defined, then you can remove them.  Otherwise you'll need to
determine why they are not being built/installed.

-- 
DISCLAIMER:

No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Received on Wed Dec 12 2012 - 15:52:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC