Re: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat

	From swhetzel_at_gmail.com Wed Dec 12 17:54:59 2012

	On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas_at_bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
	> I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the
	> standard procedure. I then get:
	>
	> # make check-old-libs
	>>>> Checking for old libraries
	> /lib/libz.so.5
	> #
	>
	> while sysutils/libchk shows:
	>
	> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5
	>         /usr/sbin/dtrace
	>         /usr/sbin/lockstat
	>
	> and indeed these two executables depend
	> on this library:
	>
	> # ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace
	> /usr/sbin/dtrace:
	>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
	>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
	>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
	>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
	>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
	>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000)
	>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000)
	> # ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat
	> /usr/sbin/lockstat:
	>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
	>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
	>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
	>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
	>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
	>         librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000)
	>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000)
	>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000)
	> #
	>
	> I see that these two executables are old:
	>
	> # ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat
	> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  58976 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace
	> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  72832 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat
	> #
	>
	> Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat
	> are obsolete and can be removed?
	>
	These 2 programs are part of the CDDL liscensed code.

	Do you have WITHOUT_CDDL defined in your src.conf or make.conf? If it
	is defined, then you can remove them.  Otherwise you'll need to
	determine why they are not being built/installed.

UZI> cat /etc/make.conf
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=   -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+=  -L/usr/local/lib
SENDMAIL_LDADD+=    -lsasl2
WITH_PKGNG=yes
PERL_VERSION=5.16.2
UZI> 
UZI> ls /etc/src*
ls: No match.
UZI> 

I did the usual make buildworld, make buildkernel, make
install kernel, reboot, make installworld.
I didn't do anything unusual.
Are you saying you've got these two files
up to date?

Thanks

Anton