On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski <lukasz_at_wasikowski.net> wrote: > W dniu 2012-12-22 04:41, Kimmo Paasiala pisze: > >>>> It looks like the reason for the difference to ipv4_addrs_IF is that >>>> the "alias" parameter for ifconfig(8) operates differently for IPv6 >>>> addresses, the first address of an interface can't be added with >>>> "alias", for IPv4 it does not care. I'll have to dig deeper but that's >>>> what the problem seems to be. >>>> >>>> -Kimmo >>> >>> The 'alias' parameter of ifconfig(8) is not the problem on the first >>> ipv6 address, I have verified that. However, there's probably >>> something in network.subr or /etc/rc.d/netif that I have overlooked >>> and causes my code to be skipped if there's no ifconfig_IF_ipv6 >>> variable defined in rc.conf(5). >>> >>> -Kimmo >> >> Yeah, this is problem in network.subr. An interface is not recognized >> as IPv6 capable if the interface is not in "ipv6_network_interfaces" >> and there's no "ifconfig_IF_ipv6" in rc.conf(5), bummer. For IPv4 it >> "just works" because the interface is always assumed to be IPv4 >> capable. > > Ok, I used ifconfig_em0_ipv6="up" and it worked. So it looks like this: > > ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO" > ipv6_network_interfaces="em0" > ifconfig_em0_ipv6="up" > ipv6_addrs_em0="2001:6a0:1cb::1-ff/64" > ipv6_defaultrouter="2001:6a0:1cb::ffff" > > Good job, thank you! :) > > -- > best regards, > Lukasz Wasikowski I'm looking into fixing the issue so you could just have the ipv6_addrs_em0 line in rc.conf. However I don't want to flood the PR and this mailing list with different versions of the patch. I want to get it right next time. Stay tuned. -KimmoReceived on Sat Dec 22 2012 - 14:29:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC