On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Rick Macklem <rmacklem_at_uoguelph.ca> wrote: ... > WITHOUT_KERBEROS is used other places, like telnetd. Were you aware of that? > (I just thought it would keep it consistent, but if you think it is better > to use a different name, I don't care.) Ah, no. I wasn't aware of that :). Given that something else has been standardized around the tree, I agree that your approach of using WITHOUT_KERBEROS is ok. I wasn't keen on the name just because it could have simplified the code using a positive instead of a negative predicate in the #ifdef. I looked at the updated patch and it looks good to me :). Thanks! -GarrettReceived on Mon Dec 31 2012 - 13:58:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC