On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Rick Macklem <rmacklem_at_uoguelph.ca> wrote: > > ... > >> WITHOUT_KERBEROS is used other places, like telnetd. Were you aware of that? >> (I just thought it would keep it consistent, but if you think it is better >> to use a different name, I don't care.) > > Ah, no. I wasn't aware of that :). Given that something else has been > standardized around the tree, I agree that your approach of using > WITHOUT_KERBEROS is ok. I wasn't keen on the name just because it > could have simplified the code using a positive instead of a negative > predicate in the #ifdef. src.conf(5) is (well, should be) authoritative for WITH_ and WITHOUT_ flags. -BenReceived on Tue Jan 01 2013 - 02:13:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC