Dear All , Today I have encountered a case which I think informing you about it may be useful . In my previous messages , I have mentioned very slowness of KDE4 . Onto another computer I have installed DruidBSD 9.0 b56 amd64 , and KDE4 . In that installation KDE4 worked surprisingly fast . To understand whether difference is among FreeBSD or DruidBSD , I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 Release amd64 and KDE4 on the same computer instead of DruidBSD . The KDE4 has worked flawlesly i.e. , means very fast . To make equivalent the installations on both computers , I have installed FreeBSD 9.0 Release amd64 and KDE4 on the slow computer exactly as in fast computer . Starting times after first boot ( to eliminate initialization effects ) are the following ( All timings are from "root" ) : >From "startx" ( which contains "exec ... kde4 ..." ) to appearance of KDE menu symbol at the bottom left corner : Fast computer : 8 GB : 0+ ( < 1 ) minute ( 4 x 2 GB ) Slow computer : 4 GB : 2+ ( < 3 ) minutes ( 2 x 2 GB ) ( 2 x ! GB chips removed ) , 6 GB : 8+ ( < 9 ) minutes ( 2 x ( 2 , 1 ) GB ) . ( Memory chip installation conforms to main board manual . ) ( The clock does not have second counter . ) Fast Computer CPU : Intel Pentium Dual CPU E2220 _at_ 2.40 GHz ( 2397.65-MHz K-8class CPU ) ACPI APIC Table : < INTEL DG965WH > Slow Computer CPU : Intel Core 2 QUAD CPU Q6600 _at_ 2.40 GHz ( 2397.65-MHz K-8class CPU ) ACPI APIC Table : < INTEL DG965WH > ( The main boards are the same ) . ( All of the memory chips are the same : Kingston HyperX 800 MHz ) I could not understand the reason(s) of the differences . Boot DMESG outputs are attached . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:24 UTC