On 07/03/12 12:30, Chris Rees wrote: > On Jul 3, 2012 10:00 AM, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> >> On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: >>> I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. >>> I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. >>> >> >> >> We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). >> >> devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so >> it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. >> >> I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt_at_. This patch also >> installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. >> >> I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard >> backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS > activated. >> >> Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 >> and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the >> list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on >> the "old" version? >> >> I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was >> really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was >> bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of >> notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. >> >> This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and >> definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using > FreeBSD". > > For anyone struggling with the new version of libreoffice, I made a package > for 9/amd64. > > http://www.bayofrum.net/tb/packages/9-local/All/libreoffice-3.5.4.tbz > > Setting up a Tinderbox is easy, and will fix the problems you are having. > > Please heed advice before shouting and blaming about problems. > > Chris > Thank you very much for the package, I'll try it and report back in. OliverReceived on Tue Jul 03 2012 - 09:28:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC