Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:34:15 +0000
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote:
> > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow.
> > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now.
> > 
> 
> 
> We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64).
> 
> devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so
> it doesn't need to be installed explicitely.
> 
> I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt_at_. This patch also
> installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated.
> 
> I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard
> backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS activated.
> 
> Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9
> and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the
> list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on
> the "old" version?
> 
> I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was
> really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was
> bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of
> notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE.
> 
> This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and
> definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD".
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"

sure libreoffice is so easy to port...

/me officially gives up with that libreoffice port, open for new volunteers 

bapt

Received on Tue Jul 03 2012 - 16:34:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC