On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > > I'm interested in which path you would choose amongst what I've seen mentioned > thus far: > > a. Modifying the boot menu to offer fine-grain control over each aspect of Safe > Mode (wherein perhaps the Safe Mode option becomes a hook for a sub-menu rather > than its current setup as an "On"/"Off" toggle). I would favor this. "Safe Mode" (or whatever it gets renamed to) activates a sub menu with N number of knobs plus an all-on/all-off option. ScottReceived on Thu Mar 01 2012 - 20:43:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:24 UTC